UFC Fight Night: Kevin Borjas vs. Andre Lima (Flyweight, Main Card)

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Kevin Borjas’ flyweight bout with Andre Lima is scheduled for the UFC Fight Night main card and sits inside a live UFC event, so the market is effectively a binary read on whether the fight goes ahead and who the official winner is. The 100% YES crowd-implied price points to a market that is already fully one-sided, with little room for further crowd persuasion unless there is a late change to bout status or a major correction in fight-week information.

Comparable pricing and previews have consistently framed Lima as the clear favourite. BetMGM listed Lima at about -650 and Borjas at +475, while preview coverage described Lima as undefeated heading in and tipped him to win by stoppage.[1][2] That kind of gap matters for prediction markets because it often concentrates the book around one outcome while still leaving settlement risk tied to UFC’s official result, especially in flyweight fights where stoppages, weight issues, or commission rulings can still alter the final state.[1][2]

For traders, the main catalysts are procedural rather than thematic: final weigh-ins, any late card reshuffles, and the UFC’s official post-fight result. The settlement rules here matter because a draw, no contest, cancellation, or postponement beyond the deadline pushes the market to 50-50 rather than a straight winner payout, so the key dependency is whether the bout is completed and formally scored by UFC. Funding flow is the other practical angle: markets like this tend to deepen when deposits clear quickly and cheaply, so friction around cards, SEPA transfers, Klarna, or USDC withdrawals can affect how much fresh liquidity arrives near event time.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We track UFC Fight Night: Kevin Borjas vs. Andre Lima (Flyweight, Main Card) on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket Deposit UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket Deposit UK is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket Deposit UK triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.