Kharg Island no longer under Iranian control by 2026?

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Kharg Island, Iran's largest oil-export terminal in the Persian Gulf, would need to fall under sustained control by a foreign military or occupying authority by 31 March 2026 for this market to settle Yes. The island sits roughly 25 kilometres off Iran's southwestern coast and has been a strategic asset since the 1960s; it currently handles roughly 5 million barrels of crude daily via offshore loading facilities. A change of control would require either direct military seizure and occupation, or a shift in de facto governance so complete that Iran no longer exercises primary governmental or military authority—temporary strikes, naval blockades, or sabotage operations do not meet the threshold.

Historical precedent suggests sustained territorial loss in the Gulf region occurs rarely without major regional conflict. Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait and subsequent liberation in 1991 remains the clearest modern analogue; the Strait of Hormuz has seen no permanent territorial transfers in decades despite recurring tensions. Current Iranian naval capabilities and air defences, whilst degraded, remain sufficient to deter opportunistic seizure. The 0% crowd probability reflects the absence of imminent military campaigns or credible occupation scenarios within the settlement window.

Traders monitoring this market should track escalations in US–Iran tensions, Israeli military operations in the region, and any announcements regarding sanctions on Iranian oil infrastructure. Recent reports from Reuters and regional defence analysts have noted increased drone activity and maritime incidents, but no credible military planning for island seizure has surfaced. Deposit flows on prediction markets typically tighten when geopolitical risk spikes; SEPA transfers and USDC on-ramps remain the primary funding rails for European traders seeking exposure to Gulf-region conflict markets.

Methodology

This page reviews Kharg Island no longer under Iranian control by 2026? across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at Polymarket Deposit UK — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket Deposit UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Polymarket Deposit UK?

Zero. Polymarket Deposit UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.